Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ

Home > Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ > Q&A

Á¦¸ñ ±Ø¸íÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ (A Striking Contrast)
ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ °ü¸®ÀÚ ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ 2015-03-23



±Ø¸íÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(´ëÁ¶)


ÃÖ±Ù¿¡ ÀϾ Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³ÀÇ ÁÖ±³¼º¼º°ú, 1988³â ´ç½Ã¿¡ ÇàÇÑ ¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³ÀÇ ÁÖ±³¼º¼ºÀº ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.

¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â  ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó   1970³â 11¿ù 1ÀÏ »ç¸®¿¡¸£ ÁÖ±³(Áö¿ªÁÖ±³)ÀÇ Àΰ¡À» ¹Þ¾Æ ¡°¼­¿ø¾øÀÌ °øµ¿ »ýÈ°À» ÇÏ´Â ¼öµµÈ¸¡±ÀÎ ¼ººñ¿À10¼¼È¸¸¦  ¼³¸³Çß´Ù.


±×·¯³ª Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³¿¡°Ô´Â ¼ººñ¿À 10¼¼È¸¿Í °°Àº ¡°¼öµµÈ¸¡±°¡ ¾ø´Ù. "¸¶¸£¼¿ ¸£Æäºê¸£ »çÁ¦È¸"´Â ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀÎ ±ÇÀ§°¡ ¾ø°í (Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³ ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ ±×·± ±ÇÀ§´Â Áö±ÝÀº ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù°í ¸»ÇÏ¿´´Ù) ±³È¸¹ý»óÀÇ ÀÔÀåµµ ¾ø°í, ±ÔÀ²µµ ¾ø´Ù.

¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â 1975³â ¼ººñ¿À10¼¼È¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÒ¹ýÀûÀÎ ¾ï¾ÐÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇØÁú ¶§±îÁö, ±×¸®°í ³ª¼­µµ ½ÉÁö¾î ºô·Î Ãß±â°æÀÌ ¹¯Èù ·Î¸¶¿¡ µÎ °³ÀÇ Ã»¿øÀ» ÇÒ ¶§±îÁö Ç×»ó ±³È¸¹ýÀ» Á¸ÁßÇÏ·Á°í ³ë·ÂÇÏ¿´°í, ¿¡ÄÜ ½ÅÇб³¿Í ´Ù¸¥ ¼öµµÈ¸¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÀûÀýÇÑ ±ÇÀ§¸¦ ½ÂÀÎ ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù.


 ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº û¿øÀÌ ¡°Á¤Áö·Â¡±À» °®°í Àֱ⿡, ¼ººñ¿À10¼¼È¸°¡  ½Ç»ó ÀνĵÇÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ Áö±Ýµµ ÇÕ¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ±× ¶§ºÎÅÍ Áö±Ý±îÁö ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾î¿Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³°¡ °áÄÚ ±³È¸¹ýÀ» ¹«½ÃÇÑ Àûµµ ¾ø¾ú°í ¡°½Å¾Ó¡±ÀÌ ±³È¸¹ýÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ÀÚ½ÅÀ» ¸éÁ¦ÇØÁØ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇØ º»Àûµµ °áÄÚ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³ÂÊ¿¡¼­´Â ±³È¸¹ýÀ» Á¸ÁßÇÏ·Á´Â ¸ð½ÀÀ» ¾îµð¿¡¼­ ã¾Æº¼ ¼ö Àִ°¡? ±× ¾î´À °÷¿¡¼­µµ ã¾Æº¼ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù!

¼º ºñ¿À10¼¼È¸´Â 18³â°£, Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ Á¶Á÷µÈ È®°íÈ÷ ¼³¸³µÈ 6°³ÀÇ ½ÅÇб³, ±³È¸, Çб³, Àü±³´Üü·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© È°·ÂÀ» º¸¿©Áָ鼭 »ì¾Æ¿À°í  ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿´À¸´Ï, ÀÌ´Â Á¤»óÀûÀÎ °¡Å縯 Á¾±³´ÜüÀÓÀ» º¸¿© ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. 1988³â¿¡´Â 200¸íÀÌ ³Ñ´Â »çÁ¦¿Í 200¸íÀÌ ³Ñ´Â ½ÅÇлý, ¼ö»ç, ¼ö»ç, ³ëµ¿¼ö»çµéÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.


Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³¿Í ÇÔ²²ÇÏ´Â ¡°´À½¼ÇÑ ÇùÀÇü¡±´Â ÀÌÁ¦ °Ü¿ì 3³âµµ ¾È µÇ´Âµ¥, ÇÕ¹ýÀûÀÎ Áú¼­µµ  ¾ø°Å´Ï¿Í ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Îµµ ½ÅÇб³°¡ ¾ø´Ù. (Çʸ®ÇÉ ¸¶´Ò¶ó ³²ºÎ¿¡  ÀÖ´Ù°í³ª Çϳª  ÀúµéÀÇ ¹«Áú¼­·Î ÀÎÇØ ÁýÁÖÀÎÀÌ ¸÷½Ã Çø¿ÀÇÏ¿© ¹®À» ´ÝÀº »óÅÂÀÌ´Ù) ÀúµéÀº ÀÌ¹Ì ÀÚ±âµé³¢¸® ºÐ¿­µÈ »óÅ´Ù. (°£·«È÷ ¸»ÇØ ¸î ¸íÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ À̸¦ »ó´ë·Î ÀÌ¹Ì ¼Ò¼ÛÀ» °É¾ú´Ù) ±×¸®°í Àúµé Áß ¸î¸îÀº °ø°³ÀûÀ¸·Î ±³È²°ø¼®ÁÖÀÇ¶ó ¸»ÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸´Ï, ´õ ÀÌ»ó Àúµé¿¡°Ô´Â ÀÏÄ¡µµ ¾ø°Å´Ï¿Í, ±×·¡¼­ °á¼Ó·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀº ºÐ¸íÇÏ´Ù.

½ÅÇб³¸¦ ¿­·Á´Â Æ÷¸£(Faure) ÁÖ±³ÀÇ 'Àǵµ': ¾îÂî ±×°¡ ¾ÆÁ÷ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁöµµ ¾Ê´Â °Í(½ÅÇб³)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¡°»ýÁ¸ÀÛÀü¡±À» ÁÖÀåÇÒ ¼ö Àִ°¡? ÀÌ°ÍÀÌ Â÷ÀÌÁ¡ÀÌ´Ù!

¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â 1980³â´ë Ãʱ⿡ ¶óĪ°Å Ãß±â°æ¿¡°Ô ÇÑ ¸íÀÇ ÁÖ±³ ¼º¼ºÀ» Çã¶ôÇØ´Þ¶ó°í ÀÌ¹Ì ¿äûÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 1988³â ÁÖ±³¼º¼º ÀÌÀüÀÇ 1³â°£ ÀûÀýÇÑ ±³È²ÀÇ Àǹ«Á¶Ç×À¸·Î¼­ À̸¦ ¾ò´Âµ¥ ¿Â°® ³ë·ÂÀ» ´ÙÇÏ¿´À¸´Ï, Áï ±³È²Àº1988³â 5¿ù 5ÀÏ ¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³ÀÇ ÁÖ±³¼º¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿øÄ¢À» ½ÂÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.


±×·¡¼­ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â 5¿ù 6ÀÏ, ÁÖ±³¼º¼ºÀÌ °ÅÇàµÉ ³¯Â¥¸¦ ¿äûÇϸ鼭 ÀÌ ½ÂÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÇÁ¦Àû ½ÇÇöÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöµµ·Ï û¿øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±³È²Àº Á÷Á¢ ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ ¿©·¯ Â÷·Ê ³¯Â¥¸¦ µÚ·Î ¹Ì·ç¾ú°í ·Î¸¶´Â ³¯Â¥¸¦ 3ÁÖ ¹Ì·ç¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í ³¯Â¥¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â ±× ÆíÁö¿¡´Â »õ·Î¿î Èĺ¸ÀÚ¸¦ ¼¼¿ì¶ó´Â °ÍÀ̾úÀ¸´Ï, ±×°ÍÀº ±× ³¯Â¥¿¡ ¸ÂÃ߱⿡´Â ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù.


ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ·Î¸¶ÀÇ Á¤Á÷ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ ¸ð½ÀÀÇ  ºÒºÐ¸íÇÑ ¿¬±â´Â ÀÌ °èȹÀ» Çã¸ÁÇÏ°Ô ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ·Î¸¶´ç±¹ÀÌ 5¿ù 5ÀÏ¿¡ ÁÖ¾îÁø ÁÖ±³¼º¼ºÀ» ½ÂÀÎÇÏ°í ½ÍÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. ÀÌ´Â ¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý '»ýÁ¸ÀÛÀü'À» ´õ ÀÌ»ó ¿¬±âÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Ô²û  ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³´Â ±³È²ÀÇ ½ÂÀÎÀ» ¾òÀ¸·Á°í ÇÏ´Â ³ë·ÂÀ» ¾îµð¿¡¼­ ã¾Æº¼ ¼ö Àִ°¡? °áÄÚ ¾îµð¿¡µµ ¾øÀ¸´Ï ÀÌ ¶ÇÇÑ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ ´ëÁ¶ÀÌ´Ù!

±³È²ÀÇ ±ÇÀ§¸¦ ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¸Å¿ì ºÐ¸íÇϸç ÀÇÁ¤¼­¿¡ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î µå·¯³µ´Ù. ¿À·ÎÁö ·Î¸¶ÀÇ Á¤Á÷ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ Á¡ÀÌ ÀÇÁ¤¼­ ¿ø¾ÈÀ» ¹«È¿·Î ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù.


±×·¯³ª Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³ÀÇ ±³È²¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±ÇÀ§ÀÇ ÀÎÁ¤À̶õ ¿ÀÁ÷ ½ÅÇÐÀûÀÎ ÀνĿ¡ ºÒ°úÇÏ°í, ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ºÎÀÎÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±×ÀÇ ¸¹Àº ¼±¾ðÀ» ¹Ì·ç¾îº¼ ¶§ Çö ±³È²¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾î¶°ÇÑ º¹Á¾µµ °ÅºÎÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
 
¼ø±³ÀÚ¸¦ ¸¸µå´Â °ÍÀº °íÅëÀ̳ª Á×À½À̶ó´Â »ç½ÇÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÇÑ »ç¶÷ÀÌ Á×À» ¶§ÀÇ ´ëÀǸíºÐÀÌ´Ù. (ÀÌ·± Á¡¿¡¼­ ¹«½½¸²¿¡°Ô´Â Ä¡¸íÀÚ°¡  ¾ø´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù!) ¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â ÀúµéÀÌ ÇàÇÑ ÀÌÀüÀÇ ÇൿÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ±× ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ÀϾ ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ ³²¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇ×ÇÏ¿´´Ù.


±×·¯³ª Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³¿Í ±× ÃßÁ¾ÀÚµéÀº ¼ººñ¿À10¼¼È¸¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¸¸µé¾îÁø ŸÇù¾ÈÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö±â Àü¿¡ ÀúÇ×ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í 3³â ÈÄ ÀÌ °°Àº ŸÇù¾ÈÀÌ ¾î´À °÷¿¡¼­µµ ã¾Æº¼ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. ¸£Æäºê¸£ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â Å« °Í¿¡ ÀúÇ×ÇÏ¿´°í 2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸÀÇ Çõ½Å(Á¾±³ÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯, ¿¡Å¥¸Þ´ÏÁò, ÁÖ±³´ÜüÁÖÀÇ)ÀÎ ºÐ¸íÇÑ ½ºÄµµé, ¼ÕÀ¸·Î ¿µ¼ºÃ¼ÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î Àü·Ê, ±×¸®°í ´Ù¸¥ ¸¹Àº ¡°½ÂÀεȡ± ½ÇÁ¦ÇàÀ§¿Í ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î1988³â ¾Æ¾¾½ÃÀÇ °Å´ëÇÑ ºÒ¹Ì½º·¯¿î ÀÏ¿¡ ÀúÇ×ÇÏ¿´´Ù.


Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³´Â 2012³â 4¿ù¿¡ Á¦¾ÈµÈ ¼±¾ð¿¡¼­ ¸î °¡Áö ¾Ö¸ÅÇÑ ¸»µéÀ» ¹Ý´ëÇϳª, ÀÌ´Â ¹«È¿°¡ µÇ¾ú°í ¸î ´Þ À̳»¿¡ ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ Æó±âµÈ °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. ´ëÀǸíºÐÀÇ ºÒ±ÕÇüÀº ¶Ñ·ÇÇÔ¿¡ ¹Ý´ëµÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

¼ººñ¿À10¼¼È¸ÀÇ »ýÁ¸À» º¸ÁõÇϱâ À§ÇØ 1988³â¿¡ ´ëÁÖ±³´Â ´ç½ÃÀÇ Àڽź¸´Ù ³ªÀÌ°¡ 35¼¼¿¡¼­ 52¼¼³ª ÀûÀº ³× ¸íÀÇ ÁÖ±³µéÀ» ¼º¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àª¸®¾ö½¼ ÁÖ±³´Â Àڽź¸´Ù ³ªÀÌ°¡ °Ü¿ìÇÑ »ì ÀûÀº »çÁ¦¸¦ ÁÖ±³·Î ¼º¼ºÇϸ鼭 »ýÁ¸À» º¸ÁõÇÏ·Á´Â ôÇÏÁö¸¸, ÀÌ ³ªÀÌ´Â °ú°Å ¼¼¼Ó ÀºÅ𿬷ÉÀ̸ç, ÁÖ±³ÀÇ ÀºÅ𿬷ɿ¡µµ ¸Å¿ì °¡±î¿î ³ªÀÌÀÎ °ÍÀÌ´Ù!  ´Ù½Ã¸»ÇÏ°Ç´ë ÀÌ ¶ÇÇÑ ´ëÁ¶µÇ´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù!




A Striking Contrast


There is a striking contrast between the recent episcopal consecration by Bishop Williamson and those done by ArchbishoArchbishop Lefebvre had founded the Society of St. Pius X, as a proper religious ¡°society of common life without vows¡±, duly canonically approved by Bishop Charrière on 1st November 1970. There is no similar ¡°society¡± with Bishop Williamson, the ¡°sacerdotal union Marcel Lefebvre¡± has no real authority – Bishop Williamson himself said that such authority was now impossible – absolutely no canonical standing and no rules.p Lefebvre in 1988.


Archbishop Lefebvre always strove to respect Canon Law, and obtained the approval of the proper authorities for his seminary of Ecône and other priories until the illegal suppression of the SSPX in 1975 made it impossible; even then he filed two appeals at Rome, which Cardinal Billot buried. Since such appeal has ¡°suspensive power¡±, the SSPX legally still exists in fact though often not recognised. It has been practically recognised since. This clearly shows that Archbishop Lefebvre never neglected Canon Law, never thought that ¡°faith¡± would dispense him from the Canon Law! But where is such respect of Canon Law on Bishop Williamson¡¯s part? It is nowhere to be seen.


The Society of St. Pius X has lived and grown for 18 years, showing its vitality by its six seminaries, its solidly established chapels, schools, missions, organised in districts as is normal for a Catholic religious society. It had in 1988 more than 200 priests, plus more than 200 seminarians, brothers, sisters, oblates, etc. The ¡°loose association¡± of priests with Bishop Williamson does not even have three years existence, with no regular order, practically no seminaries (the one in the Philippines in south of Manila was closed because their hostess was so disgusted by the disorder!): they already have big divisions among themselves (to the point that some have already made civil lawsuits against others) and some are already openly sedevacantists, thus manifesting no unity among themselves: hence no solidity.


It is claimed that Bishop Faure ¡°intends¡± to open a seminary: how can he claim a ¡°survival operation¡± for something that does not yet exist? What a contrast!


Archbishop Lefebvre had already asked Cardinal Ratzinger in the early 80s for the consecration of a bishop, and for a whole year before the 1988 Consecrations, he made every effort possible to have it done with the proper papal mandate – to the point that the Pope approved on May 5th 1988 the principle of a consecration by Archbishop Lefebvre. He then, on May 6th, asked for the practical realisation of this approval, requesting a date for the ceremony: he had himself already postponed several times the date; Rome waited three weeks to give him a date, and the very letter offering a date asked for new candidates which made it impossible to be ready for that date: this dishonesty manifested that Rome did not intend to observe the approval given on May 5th, and by indefinite delays would made it void. This decided Archbishop Lefebvre not to delay any more his ¡°survival operation¡±. But where are the efforts of Bishop Williamson to obtain any approval by the Pope? Absolutely none! What a contrast!


The recognition of the authority of the Pope was very clear and concretely manifested by the protocol; only the dishonesty of Rome made this protocol void. But the recognition of the authority of the Pope by Bishop Williamson is only a theoretical recognition, denied in practice and by his many declarations rejecting ANY submission to the current Pope.


St Augustine says that what makes a martyr is not the fact of suffering and death but the cause for which one dies (thus there is no Muslim martyrs!) Archbishop Lefebvre resisted real abuses AFTER they were done, not before! But Bishop Williamson and his followers resisted BEFORE any compromise by the SSPX was made, and even three years later such compromise is nowhere to be seen. Archbishop Lefebvre resisted BIG and evident scandals, such as the novelties of Vatican II (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality), the New Liturgy, with its communion in the hand, and many other ¡°approved¡± practices and finally the huge scandal of Assisi in 1986. Bishop Williamson opposes some ambiguous words in a proposed April 2012 declaration, which was made void and completely discarded within months: the disproportion of the cause is against striking.


To assure the survival of the SSPX, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops between 35 and 52 years younger than he was in 1988. Bishop Williamson pretends to assure a survival¡¦ consecrating a bishop who is just one year younger than himself, very past secular retirement age and very close to bishops¡¯ retirement age! Again, what a contrast!